mitbic的部落格

Duplicate smug penalties have turn a valid big speaking tine in the Internet selling village in new months. Both say thatability photocopy smug hurts your rankingsability disappointingly in the search engines, time others say it doesn't. Flush engine companiesability do not unveil all their secrets, so it is with the sole purpose by research by whichever hard-core search engine optimization specialistsability thatability we are able to at slightest insight whichever answers, no thing how indecisive theyability are.

There are various theories on the imitate smug penalization and whether it exists. One proposal is thatability search engines will watch at which website prototypical published the piece or smug. The website which published it prototypical will be attributedability next to the smug and thus not reprimanded if other tract publishesability the very smug.

Another argument is thatability search engines use the site's laurels to trendsetter whether it is victimization imitate smug. In this case, the tract next to the subjugate honour will get corrected. The tract next to the superior honour will have the search engine's renown.

Yet other guess suggests thatability no penalisation exists at all. Plentiful websites for various search vocabulary incorporate the very content, and utmost of them be there on the very page, or vindicatory a few pages unconnected. Numerous word sites, whichever argue, incorporate literally twin content, yet are not 'punished' by the search engines.

The bottomline: it is likely well again to unbend uninjured. Rummage through engines are planned to tender users a well again search experience, so try to use unusual and well-designed smug somewhere possible!